Shealy v. Shealy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Shealy v. Shealy

113 S.E. 131, 120 S.C. 276, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 130

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 5, 1922

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 131 (Shealy v. Shealy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shealy v. Shealy, 113 S.E. 131, 120 S.C. 276, 1922 S.C. LEXIS 130 (S.C. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for construction of a deed. The deed with the circuit decree will be reported.

So much of the decree as adjudges that, by the granting clause, a fee-simple estate is conveyed to Thompson E. Shealy, which cannot be cut down by subsequent clauses of the deed, is affirmed. Glenn v. Jamison: 48 S. C., 316; 26 S. E., 677. Adams v. Verner: 102 S. C., 7; 86 S. E., 211. The application of the rule in Shelley’s case to the habendum clause need not be considered.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI