Shealor v. Superior Court

11 P. 653, 70 Cal. 564, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 846
California Supreme Court·Decided August 31, 1886·No. No. 11557·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The Court.

In this cause, the plaintiff brought his action in a Justice’s Court to recover various articles of personal property, the aggregate value of which, as averred in the complaint, amounted to $319. The prayer of the complaint was: “1. For the possession of said goods, or for $299 in case possession cannot be had; 2. For $150 damages for the detention thereof, and the costs of the action.”

The cause came on to be tried, when the defendant moved that the cause be dismissed on the ground that the demands of the plaintiff exceeded the jurisdiction of the court.

The Justice’s Court dismissed the action.

The plaintiff then took an appeal to the Superior Court above named on questions of law and fact.

The Superior Court, against the objection of defendant, proceeded to try the case; he did try it, and rendered a judgment for the plaintiff.

The value of the property having been averred in the complaint to be $319, for which possession was asked, neither the Justice’s Court nor the Superior Court on appeal had jurisdiction of the action.

The judgment of the Superior Court must be annulled and quashed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shealor v. Superior Court, 11 P. 653, 70 Cal. 564, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 846 (Cal. 1886).

11 P. 653 (Shealor v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Redlands High School District v. Superior Court
125 P.2d 490 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Dickson v. Parker
212 P. 42 (California Court of Appeal, 1922)
J. Dewing Co. v. Thompson
124 P. 1035 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
Bates v. Ferrier
124 P. 889 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
Oppenheimer v. Regan
79 P. 695 (Montana Supreme Court, 1905)