Sheaff v. Gray

2 Yeates 273
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 15, 1798
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Yeates 273 (Sheaff v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheaff v. Gray, 2 Yeates 273 (Pa. 1798).

Opinion

By the court.

This paper cannot be called an estimate or calculation. It goes to substantiate the demand of the plaintiffs. It is a dangerous precedent, and may lead to ill consequences, though we do not suppose there was any intention here of doing wrong. All the cases agree, that a party delivering papers to the jury, without consent or the leave of the court, a new trial shall be granted. 5 Bac. 291. We know not what effect this paper may have produced in the minds of the jury; but we well know, they should not have had it delivered to them. Solely on this ground, and without expressing our sentiments as to the merits of the case, a new trial is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buckel v. Suss
28 Abb. N. Cas. 21 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1892)
Atkins v. State
16 Ark. 568 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Yeates 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheaff-v-gray-pa-1798.