Sheaff v. Gray

2 Yeates 273
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1798·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the court.

This paper cannot be called an estimate or calculation. It goes to substantiate the demand of the plaintiffs. It is a dangerous precedent, and may lead to ill consequences, though we do not suppose there was any intention here of doing wrong. All the cases agree, that a party delivering papers to the jury, without consent or the leave of the court, a new trial shall be granted. 5 Bac. 291. We know not what effect this paper may have produced in the minds of the jury; but we well know, they should not have had it delivered to them. Solely on this ground, and without expressing our sentiments as to the merits of the case, a new trial is awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheaff v. Gray, 2 Yeates 273 (Pa. 1798).

2 Yeates 273 (Sheaff v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buckel v. Suss
28 Abb. N. Cas. 21 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1892)
Atkins v. State
16 Ark. 568 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1855)