Sheafe v. O'Neil
9 Mass. 13
Opinion
The Court observed that a tenant in dower was not seised of an undivided third part; nor could the tenant in this case defend against this action, unless her dower had been legally assigned to her. — The pleadings were then withdrawn by consent, and the tenant was defaulted.
Mellen and Lyman for the demandant.
Holmes for the tenant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheafe v. O'Neil, 9 Mass. 13 (Mass. 1812).
9 Mass. 13 (Sheafe v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morris v. Glaser
151 A. 766 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Raulerson v. Peeples
84 So. 370 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Neal v. Davis
99 P. 69 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)
McMahon v. Gray
5 L.R.A. 748 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Smith v. Shaw
22 N.E. 924 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Clarke v. Hilton
75 Me. 426 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1883)
Sears v. Sears
121 Mass. 267 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)
Runnells v. Webber
59 Me. 488 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1871)
Silloway v. Brown
94 Mass. 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1866)
Mumma v. Harrisburg, Portsmouth, Mount Joy, & Lancaster Railroad
1 Pears. 65 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1854)
Johnson v. Shields
32 Me. 424 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1851)
May v. Rumney
1 Mich. 1 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1847)
Grimes v. Wilson
4 Blackf. 331 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1837)
Robinson v. Leavitt
7 N.H. 73 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1834)
Tompkins v. Fonda
4 Paige Ch. 448 (New York Court of Chancery, 1834)
Stedman v. Fortune
5 Conn. 462 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1825)
Pringle v. Gaw
5 Serg. & Rawle 536 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1820)
Snow v. Stevens
15 Mass. 277 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1818)
Motley v. Blake
12 Mass. 280 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1815)