Shea v. Riverview Canning Co.

231 A.D. 539, 247 N.Y.S. 770, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16098

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of Martin, J., in Shea v. Falls Canning Co. (231 App. Div. 535), handed down herewith, the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, 0’Mali.ey and Sherman, JJ.; Merrell, J., dissents.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shea v. Riverview Canning Co., 231 A.D. 539, 247 N.Y.S. 770, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

231 A.D. 539 (Shea v. Riverview Canning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shea v. Falls Canning Co.
231 A.D. 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)