Shea v. Riverview Canning Co.

231 A.D. 539, 247 N.Y.S. 770, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16098

This text of 231 A.D. 539 (Shea v. Riverview Canning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shea v. Riverview Canning Co., 231 A.D. 539, 247 N.Y.S. 770, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of Martin, J., in Shea v. Falls Canning Co. (231 App. Div. 535), handed down herewith, the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, 0’Mali.ey and Sherman, JJ.; Merrell, J., dissents.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shea v. Falls Canning Co.
231 A.D. 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 539, 247 N.Y.S. 770, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shea-v-riverview-canning-co-nyappdiv-1931.