Shea v. Clesto Auto Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shea v. Clesto Auto Service, Inc.

27 A.D.2d 573, 277 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 573 (Shea v. Clesto Auto Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shea v. Clesto Auto Service, Inc., 27 A.D.2d 573, 277 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 19,1966, reversed on the facts, and new trial granted as between [574]*574the plaintiffs Shea and appellant, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, the female plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $20,000 to $12,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict as to the female plaintiff was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 19,1966, reversed on the facts, and new trial granted as between [574]*574the plaintiffs Shea and appellant, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, the female plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $20,000 to $12,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict as to the female plaintiff was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 573, 277 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shea-v-clesto-auto-service-inc-nyappdiv-1966.