Shea v. City of Springfield

391 N.E.2d 1253, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 883, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2306, 1979 Mass. App. LEXIS 1047
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedJuly 17, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 N.E.2d 1253 (Shea v. City of Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shea v. City of Springfield, 391 N.E.2d 1253, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 883, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2306, 1979 Mass. App. LEXIS 1047 (Mass. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

1. These cases are governed by Holyoke Police Relief Assn. v. Mayor of Holyoke, 358 Mass. 350 (1970), as the trial judge ruled. Like Holyoke, Springfield has accepted the provisions of G. L. c. 41, § 111D, and G. L. c. 147, §§ 16C & 17, and under that configuration of applicable statutes the policemen are entitled, as the Holyoke case held, to the number of calendar weeks of vacation specified in G. L. c. 41, § HID, in addition to the total of 104 days off specified in G. L. c. 147, §§ 16C & 17. In Gurley v. Bridgewater, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 149 (1976), the town had not accepted G. L. c. 41, § 111D; and in McNamara v. Selectmen of Westwood, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 805 (1977), the town had not accepted G. L. c. 147, §§ 16C & 17. 2. There is no merit to the contention that the judge erred in "retroactively applying the Holyoke decision.” That case merely determined the legal effect of the applicable statutes; it did not purport to alter their meaning. 3. The judge did not err in ruling that the collective bargaining agreements [884]*884were meant to preserve the vacation benefits to which the policemen were legally entitled prior to their effective dates. 4. It is not clear whether the city still presses the defense of laches; but, on the judge’s findings, it is clear that the defense has not been made out, for the reasons stated in Erickson v. Waltham, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 436, 450-451 (1974).

William P. O’Neill, Assistant City Solicitor, for the defendant. Frederick S. Pillsbury for Daniel J. Shea. Ralph L. Atkins for Robert C. McKenzie.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Medfield Police League v. Board of Selectmen
406 N.E.2d 1043 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 N.E.2d 1253, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 883, 103 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2306, 1979 Mass. App. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shea-v-city-of-springfield-massappct-1979.