Shea v. City of San Francisco
This text of 139 F. App'x 812 (Shea v. City of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff Kevin Shea’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq. Shea, a disabled San Francisco firefighter, alleges that the defendants, the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Fire Department, denied him administrative assignment pay or holiday premium pay because of his disability. Shea was not paid holiday premium pay on a consistent basis, as the district court noted. The problem is that there is nothing in this record to establish any causal link between his failure to receive administrative assignment pay or holiday premium pay and his disability. See, e.g., Sanders v. Ameson Prods., Inc., 91 F.3d 1351, 1353 (9th Cir. 1996). The district court therefore did not err in granting summary judgment to the defendants. The district court’s judgment must be affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shea-v-city-of-san-francisco-ca9-2005.