Shea, Kevin Michael

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2014
DocketWR-78,954-02
StatusPublished

This text of Shea, Kevin Michael (Shea, Kevin Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shea, Kevin Michael, (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,954-02

EX PARTE KEVIN MICHAEL SHEA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NUMBER 31,368-B TH IN THE 66 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HILL COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.

Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of

indecency with a child and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Tenth Court

of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Shea v. State, 167 S.W. 3d 98 (Tex. App.–Waco 2005).

Applicant claims that the complainant is now recanting the allegations against him and he is therefore entitled to relief. This Court remanded the application for a live hearing to

have the complainant testify. The district court appointed a master to conduct the writ

hearing. The master signed findings of fact recommending to this Court that the application

be granted. The district judge disagreed, did not adopt the master’s findings, and signed his

own findings recommending to this Court that the application be denied.

After a thorough independent review of both the trial record and the habeas record in

this case, this Court finds that Applicant did not meet his burden to obtain habeas relief.

Applicant’s habeas claims based on the recantation of the complainant are denied. His

claims of jury charge error and denial of a lesser included offense instruction, which are

based on the trial record, are dismissed as subsequent. T EX. C RIM. A PP. Art. 11.07 §4.

Filed: September 17, 2014 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shea v. State
167 S.W.3d 98 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shea, Kevin Michael, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shea-kevin-michael-texcrimapp-2014.