SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC

Court of Appeals of Georgia

SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC

DecidedMarch 4, 2025

DocketA25A1231

StatusPublished

This text of SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC (SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 04, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1231. SHAZIA GULNAZ et al. v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC et al.

Shazia Gulnaz and Pervez Barkat (“the plaintiffs”) sued CC Clarkston LLC and Alexander Properties Group Inc. (“the defendants”) for failure to repair and maintain their apartment, and a jury awarded the plaintiffs $5,000.00 in damages. The defendants then filed a motion seeking $6,237.00 in attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11- 68 based on their offer to settle, which the plaintiffs rejected. The trial court granted the motion, awarding the defendants $1,127.00, which represented the attorney fees minus the damages owed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Generally, an order awarding attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11-68 may be appealed directly. See, e.g., Anglin v. Smith, 358 Ga. App. 38 (853 SE2d 142) (2020). But, under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less — including awards of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11- 68 — must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See Anderson v. Laureano, 342 Ga. App. 888, 888 (805 SE2d 636) (2017). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because the trial court’s award of $1,127.00 does not meet the damages threshold, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Anderson, 342 Ga. App. at 889.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/04/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 04, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A1231. SHAZIA GULNAZ et al. v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC et al.

Shazia Gulnaz and Pervez Barkat (“the plaintiffs”) sued CC Clarkston LLC and Alexander Properties Group Inc. (“the defendants”) for failure to repair and maintain their apartment, and a jury awarded the plaintiffs $5,000.00 in damages. The defendants then filed a motion seeking $6,237.00 in attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11- 68 based on their offer to settle, which the plaintiffs rejected. The trial court granted the motion, awarding the defendants $1,127.00, which represented the attorney fees minus the damages owed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Generally, an order awarding attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11-68 may be appealed directly. See, e.g., Anglin v. Smith, 358 Ga. App. 38 (853 SE2d 142) (2020). But, under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), appeals in actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000 or less — including awards of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-11- 68 — must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See Anderson v. Laureano, 342 Ga. App. 888, 888 (805 SE2d 636) (2017). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because the trial court’s award of $1,127.00 does not meet the damages threshold, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Anderson, 342 Ga. App. at 889.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/04/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

SHAZIA GULNAZ v. CC CLARKSTON, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shazia-gulnaz-v-cc-clarkston-llc-gactapp-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack