Shazer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shazer v. State

3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2009 WL 605366

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2009

Docket4D07-4646

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 So. 3d 453 (Shazer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shazer v. State, 3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2009 WL 605366 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2009 WL 605366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shazer-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack