Shazer v. State
3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2009 WL 605366
Opinion
The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shazer v. State, 3 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956, 2009 WL 605366 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
3 So. 3d 453 (Shazer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinney v. State
66 So. 3d 852 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)
McKinney v. State
24 So. 3d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)