SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 2019

Docket19-0649

StatusPublished

This text of SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO. (SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO., (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC, as assignee ) of Christine Jennings, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-649 ) STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. ) CO., ) ) Respondent. ) )

Opinion filed September 13, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Gregory P. Holder, Judge.

David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A, Tampa; and Christopher Ligori and Ronald S. Haynes of Christopher Ligori & Associates, Tampa, for Petitioner.

Ezequiel Lugo of Banker Lopez Gassler, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We grant in part Shazam Auto Glass, LLC's petition for writ of certiorari

and quash the circuit court's order to the extent that it may be construed to

independently exercise jurisdiction over and quash the county court's March 8, 2018,

discovery order. In all other respects, the petition is denied. LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI