Shayne v. Guelpa

38 A.D.3d 877, 831 N.Y.S.2d 343

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon a parcel of real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brennan, J.), entered March 6, 2006, which denied his motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants, inter alia, from terminating his occupancy of the subject property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a probability of success on the merits and a balancing of the equities in his favor, two of the requirements that must be shown to prevail on a motion for a preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6301; Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d [878]*878860, 862 [1990]; Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]; McNeil v Mohammed, 32 AD3d 829, 830 [2006]; Ruiz v Meloney, 26 AD3d 485, 486 [2006]). Rivera, J.E, Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shayne v. Guelpa, 38 A.D.3d 877, 831 N.Y.S.2d 343 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 877 (Shayne v. Guelpa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Axelrod
532 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Aetna Insurance v. Capasso
552 N.E.2d 166 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Ruiz v. Meloney
26 A.D.3d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
McNeil v. Mohammed
32 A.D.3d 829 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)