Shawver v. Shawver

136 P. 436, 25 Idaho 70, 1913 Ida. LEXIS 10
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided November 3, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

AILSHIE, C. J.

In this case the evidence is sufficient to support the findings. The findings in turn substantially comply with the requirements of the statute and cover all the material issues. (Sandstrom v. Smith, 12 Ida. 446, 86 Pac. 416; Brown v. Macey, 13 Ida. 451, 90 Pac. 339.) It was not necessary for the court to make findings on immaterial or collateral issues, or on any issue where a finding either way could not have affected or changed the judgment that was entered in the ease. (Wood v. Broderson, 12 Ida. 190, 85 Pac. 490; State v. Baird, 13 Ida. 126, 89 Pac. 298.)

The findings in this case are sufficient to support the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. No costs awarded.

Sullivan and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shawver v. Shawver, 136 P. 436, 25 Idaho 70, 1913 Ida. LEXIS 10 (Idaho 1913).

136 P. 436 (Shawver v. Shawver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. Bock
204 P.2d 1010 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1949)
Metzker v. Lowther
204 P.2d 1025 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1949)
Barker v. McKellar
294 P. 196 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1930)
Wood v. Williamson
260 P. 158 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1927)
Peoples v. Whitworth
238 P. 306 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1925)