Shawver v. Shawver
This text of 136 P. 436 (Shawver v. Shawver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the evidence is sufficient to support the findings. The findings in turn substantially comply with the requirements of the statute and cover all the material issues. (Sandstrom v. Smith, 12 Ida. 446, 86 Pac. 416; Brown v. Macey, 13 Ida. 451, 90 Pac. 339.) It was not necessary for the court to make findings on immaterial or collateral issues, or on any issue where a finding either way could not have affected or changed the judgment that was entered in the ease. (Wood v. Broderson, 12 Ida. 190, 85 Pac. 490; State v. Baird, 13 Ida. 126, 89 Pac. 298.)
The findings in this case are sufficient to support the judgment. The judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. No costs awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 P. 436, 25 Idaho 70, 1913 Ida. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawver-v-shawver-idaho-1913.