Shawn Wesley Egerson

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedSeptember 30, 2022
Docket21-22557
StatusUnknown

This text of Shawn Wesley Egerson (Shawn Wesley Egerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shawn Wesley Egerson, (Wis. 2022).

Opinion

So Ordered. □□ al Dated: September 30, 2022 Ga” Katherine Me Prbdble Katherine Maloney Perhach United States Bankruptcy Judge

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Chapter 13 Shawn Wesley Egerson, Case No. 21-22557-kmp Debtor.

DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING RACINE COUNTY TREASURER’S OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF DEBTOR’S AMENDED PLAN

The issue before the Court is whether the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan must pay the Wisconsin statutory rate of interest for past due property taxes on the entire amount of the nine claims filed by the Racine County Treasurer (the “County”). The Debtor has proposed in his Chapter 13 plan to pay 12% interest on the tax principal amounts, but to pay 3.25% interest on the interest and penalties that have accrued. The County has asserted that the Debtor should pay 12% interest on the entire amount of the nine claims. For the reasons stated below, the Court holds that the Debtor’s Chapter 13 plan is not required to pay 12% interest on already accrued interest and penalties. Accordingly, the County’s objection to confirmation of the Debtor’s plan is overruled. The Debtor owns nine rental properties in Racine, Wisconsin. The County has filed nine proofs of claim for the nine properties for past due real estate taxes, interest, and penalties owed by the Debtor to the County. The Debtor’s amended plan proposes to pay all nine of the County’s claims in full as secured claims.' The following chart summarizes the Debtor’s proposed treatment of the properties in his plan and the proofs of claim filed by the County related to those properties:

' The Court rejects the County’s argument that the Debtor should have brought a motion or claim objection under Rule 3012(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure to determine the amount of the County’s secured claims. The Debtor’s amended plan does not request a determination of the amount of the County’s secured claims. Instead, the Debtor has proposed to treat the County’s claims as fully secured.

Claim Property County County Debtor’s Plan- County Debtor’s Plan- No. Address Claim – Claim – Proposed Claim – Proposed Total Tax Treatment of Interest Treatment of Claim Principal2 Tax Principal and Interest and Amount Penalties Penalties

14 1713 West $15,405.27 $12,504.06 $12,504.06 at $2,901.21 $2,901.21 at Boulevard 12% interest for 3.25% interest past due amounts for interest and penalties 15 1024 $30,728.13 $18,815.58 $18,815.58 at $11,637.55 $11,912.55 at Wilson 12% interest for 3.25% interest Street past due amounts for interest and penalties 16 809 Ninth $35,498.80 $19,501.01 $19,501.01 at $15,722.79 $15,997.79 at Street 12% interest for 3.25% interest past due amounts for interest and penalties 17 1110 $33,302.60 $18,848.87 $18,848.87 at $14,178.73 $14,453.73 at Seventeenth 12% interest for 3.25% interest Street past due amounts for interest and penalties 18 1338 $27,961.97 $15,084.46 $15,084.46 at $12,602.51 $12,877.51 at Twelfth 12% interest for 3.25% interest Street past due amounts for interest and penalties 19 1912 $39,891.94 $23,247.65 $23,247.65 at $16,369.29 $16,644.29 at Phillips 12% interest for 3.25% interest Avenue past due amounts for interest and penalties 20 1932 Mead $27,027.60 $19,070.91 $19,070.91 at $7,681.69 $7,956.69 at Street 12% interest for 3.25% interest past due amounts for interest and penalties 21 1725 Center $15,428.10 $11,020.82 $11,020.82 at $4,132.28 $4,407.28 at Street 12% interest for 3.25% interest past due amounts for interest and penalties 22 818 $5,010.69 $4,385.16 $4,385.16 at $625.53 $625.53 for Seventeenth 12% interest for interest and Street past due amounts penalties (no interest in plan)

2 This amount was calculated using the nine claims filed by the County, including the Statement of Taxes Due, the 2020 Real Estate Tax Summary, and the other documents attached to the claims. This amount is also supported by the Property Tax Breakout that the County filed with its brief showing the amount of each component of its claim due for each tax year. Docket No. 141-1. To summarize the chart above, the Debtor’s amended plan separated each of the County’s claims into two amounts – the tax principal and the interest and penalties – for the purpose of calculating the interest to be paid on the County’s claims over the life of the Chapter 13 plan. Docket No. 124. The Debtor proposed to pay the tax principal in full with interest at the rate of 12% over the plan term. The Debtor proposed to pay the interest and penalties in full as well, but with interest at the rate of 3.25% over the plan term.

The County objected to confirmation of the Debtor’s amended plan, arguing that for it to receive the present value of its nine claims the Debtor must pay 12% interest on the County’s entire claim – the tax principal and the interest and penalties.

Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that if a Chapter 13 debtor elects to retain property subject to a lien, the debtor’s plan must provide for payments to the secured creditor whose total “value, as of the effective date of the plan . . . is not less than the allowed amount of such claim” unless the secured creditor accepts a plan providing different treatment. These payments “must be calibrated to ensure that, over time, the creditor receives disbursements whose total present value equals or exceeds that of the allowed claim.” Till v. SCS Credit Corp., 541 U.S. 465, 469 (2004). For a plan to satisfy § 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) when the debtor is making payments over time, the debtor must pay interest on secured claims. Id. at 473- 75.

Section 511 establishes the rate of interest to be paid on tax claims. That section provides:

If any provision of [the Bankruptcy Code] requires the payment of interest on a tax claim or on an administrative expense tax, or the payment of interest to enable a creditor to receive the present value of the allowed amount of a tax claim, the rate of interest shall be the rate determined under applicable nonbankruptcy law.

11 U.S.C. § 511(a).

Section 74.47 of the Wisconsin Statutes is the “applicable nonbankruptcy law” that provides the rate of interest to be applied to a tax claim under § 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) and § 511. It provides:

INTEREST. The interest rate on delinquent general property taxes, special charges, special assessments and special taxes included in the tax roll for collection is one percent per month or fraction of a month.

Wis. Stat. § 74.47(1). In other words, interest accrues at the rate of 12% per year on “delinquent general property taxes, special charges, special assessments and special taxes” in Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Statutes also permit the imposition of a penalty of up to 6% per year on “delinquent general property taxes, special assessments, special charges and special taxes,” providing:

PENALTY ALLOWED.

(a) Any county board and the common council of any city authorized to act under s. 74.87 may by ordinance impose a penalty of up to 0.5 percent per month or fraction of a month, in addition to the interest under sub. (1), on any delinquent general property taxes, special assessments, special charges and special taxes included in the tax roll.

(b) Any ordinance enacted under par. (a) may specify that the penalty under this subsection shall apply to any general property taxes, special assessments, special charges and special taxes that are delinquent on the effective date of the ordinance.

Wis. Stat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Till v. SCS Credit Corp.
541 U.S. 465 (Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Jones
368 B.R. 602 (S.D. Texas, 2007)
Village of Westby v. Bekkedal
178 N.W. 451 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1920)
Munkwitz Realty & Investment Co. v. Diederich Schaefer Co.
286 N.W. 30 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shawn Wesley Egerson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawn-wesley-egerson-wieb-2022.