Shawn Ting Scheu v. Fan Ru Tseng

72 A.D.3d 930, 898 N.Y.S.2d 502
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 2010·Published·Cited by 229 cases

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated October 8, 2008, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), dated April 30, 2009, which denied his motion to vacate the judgment of divorce pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (2) and (3).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to meet his burden of establishing the existence of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct on the part of either the defendant or an agent of the defendant, and thus, was not entitled to vacatur of the parties’ divorce judgment (see Mohrmann v Lynch-Mohrmann, 24 AD3d 735 [2005]; Badgett v Badgett, 2 AD3d 379 [2003]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shawn Ting Scheu v. Fan Ru Tseng, 72 A.D.3d 930, 898 N.Y.S.2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

72 A.D.3d 930 (Shawn Ting Scheu v. Fan Ru Tseng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierre v. Weir
2025 NY Slip Op 02231 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Celesia v. Celesia
136 A.D.3d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Beckwith v. Xi Yang
106 A.D.3d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Farhadi v. Qureshi
105 A.D.3d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Mims v. Perez
79 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)