Shawn Smith v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shawn Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6020
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 27, 2015·No. 06-14-00156-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00156-CR

SHAWN SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-F-106-102

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the court reporter’s record in this case indicates that such record contains

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The court reporter’s record includes the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(f) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the court reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order the Clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f), to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record, including all exhibits and DVD’s, in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: April 27, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shawn Smith v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Shawn Smith v. State (Shawn Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.