Shawn Pierre Francis v. The State of Wyoming

2022 WY 108, 516 P.3d 483
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 2022
DocketS-22-0124
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 WY 108 (Shawn Pierre Francis v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shawn Pierre Francis v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 108, 516 P.3d 483 (Wyo. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2022 WY 108

April Term, A.D. 2022

September 8, 2022

SHAWN PIERRE FRANCIS,

Appellant (Defendant),

v. S-22-0124

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee (Plaintiff).

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to felony driving while under the influence, a fourth or subsequent offense in ten years. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 31-5- 233. The district court imposed a sentence of three and one-half to seven years. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s March 9, 2022, Judgment and Sentence.

[¶2] On July 1, 2022, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before August 22, 2022, Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Shawn Pierre Francis, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Johnson County District Court’s March 9, 2022, Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 8th day of September, 2022.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 WY 108, 516 P.3d 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawn-pierre-francis-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2022.