Shawn Mahler v. Schreiter Ready-Mix
This text of Shawn Mahler v. Schreiter Ready-Mix (Shawn Mahler v. Schreiter Ready-Mix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 21-3823 ___________________________
Shawn Mahler
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Schreiter Ready-Mix & Materials, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Filed: July 11, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Shawn Mahler appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action against his employer,
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Schreiter Ready-Mix & Materials, Inc. (Schreiter). We affirm the grant of summary judgment. See Liles v. C.S. McCrossan, Inc., 851 F.3d 810, 817 (8th Cir. 2017). Upon careful review, we agree with the district court that Mahler failed to timely exhaust administrative remedies as to his hostile work environment claims, as he did not file his charge of discrimination within 300 days of his last day of work. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1); AMTRAK v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 112, 122 (2002); Moses v. Dassault Falcon Jet - Wilmington Corp, 894 F.3d 911, 920 (8th Cir. 2018); Hutson v. Wells Dairy, Inc., 578 F.3d 823, 826 (8th Cir. 2009). While Mahler argues on appeal that Schreiter failed to preserve the exhaustion issue by not sufficiently pleading it, we conclude that Mahler waived this argument by not raising it below, see Wever v. Lincoln County, 388 F.3d 601, 608 (8th Cir. 2004), and that Mahler had sufficient notice of the issue, see First Union Nat’l Bank v. Pictet Overseas Trust Corp., 477 F.3d 616, 622 (8th Cir. 2007).
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shawn Mahler v. Schreiter Ready-Mix, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawn-mahler-v-schreiter-ready-mix-ca8-2022.