Shawn L. Sanders v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 14, 2015
Docket04-14-00843-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Shawn L. Sanders v. State (Shawn L. Sanders v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shawn L. Sanders v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00843-CR

Shawn L. SANDERS, Appellant

v. The STATE The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR5452 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 14, 2015

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant was sentenced on January 28, 2013. No timely motion for new trial having been

filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than February 27, 2013. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.2. Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until October 23, 2014.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely

so as to invoke this court’s jurisdiction if: (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed

for filing; (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of 04-14-00843-CR

the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal; and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion

for extension of time. See id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within fifteen days of the

last day allowed for filing, and no motion for extension of time was filed.

On December 9, 2014, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by December 29,

2014, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id.; see also Ater v.

Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final

felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). Appellant did not respond to this court’s order. Because

appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shawn L. Sanders v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawn-l-sanders-v-state-texapp-2015.