Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shawfrank v. Shawfrank

Shawfrank v. Shawfrank

779 So. 2d 637, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, 2001 WL 223289
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2001
DocketNos. 1D99-4744, 1D00-698
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 637 (Shawfrank v. Shawfrank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shawfrank v. Shawfrank, 779 So. 2d 637, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, 2001 WL 223289 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record supports the trial court’s conclusion that the funds from the husband’s inheritance became a marital asset. These funds were commingled with other marital funds in an account that was used in part for marital purposes. The husband failed to rebut the presumption that he intended to make an interspousal gift by mixing these funds with other property of the marriage. See Woodard v. Woodard, 634 So.2d 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We have carefully examined the record in light of the remaining arguments in this appeal and find no error.

Affirmed.

BENTON, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodard v. Woodard
634 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 637, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2507, 2001 WL 223289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawfrank-v-shawfrank-fladistctapp-2001.