Shawe v. Wilmerden
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 380 (Shawe v. Wilmerden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Let the defendant, on payment of costs, have leave to withdraw his notice and plead the special mátter; the plaintiff to be at liberty to discontinue without costs.
Motion granted.
The rule is, that where a defendant, before judgment, shows to the court that he has obtained his discharge under an insolvent law, he will, though by strict practice too late in his application, be permitted to plead it, on paying costs. Broome v. Beardsley, 3 Caines’ Rep. 172; President and Directors of the Merchants' Bank v. Moore, 2 Johns. Rep. 294; see Lackey & Briggs v. M'Donald, Caines’ Rop. 117, n. (a.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Cai. Cas. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawe-v-wilmerden-nysupct-1805.