Shawe v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Shawe v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

125 N.E.3d 150, 101 N.Y.S.3d 734, 33 N.Y.3d 1009

CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

DecidedMay 7, 2019

Docket2019-99

StatusPublished

This text of 125 N.E.3d 150 (Shawe v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shawe v. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, 125 N.E.3d 150, 101 N.Y.S.3d 734, 33 N.Y.3d 1009 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, insofar as taken from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the March 2018 judgment upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved and ***1010otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the March 2018 judgment, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court's own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, insofar as taken from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the March 2018 judgment upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved and ***1010otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the March 2018 judgment, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 N.E.3d 150, 101 N.Y.S.3d 734, 33 N.Y.3d 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shawe-v-kramer-levin-naftalis-frankel-llp-nycterr-2019.