Shaw v. Wallace
2 U.S. 179, 2 Dall. 179
Opinion
2 Dall. 179
1 L.Ed. 339
Shaw
v.
Wallace
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
September Term, 1792
This cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant's attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.
But, By the Court: It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.
Rule granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. Wallace, 2 U.S. 179, 2 Dall. 179 (1792).
2 U.S. 179 (Shaw v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lowe v. Kansas
163 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 1896)