Shaw v. Swift

1 Smith & H. 398
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Smith & H. 398 (Shaw v. Swift) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Swift, 1 Smith & H. 398 (Ind. 1849).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The heirs to whom this land descended, had a right to have the administrator’s sale to himself set aside by application in a reasonable time, upon payment of the purchase money, the value of improvements, &c. Gage v. Pike, November term, 1848, and cases cited. In this case it does not appear that the administrator, Reeder Powell, paid anything, from his own funds, for the land, and the improvements made by %im are not equal in value to the rents, which have not been claimed by the complainants; and under the circumstances of this case, we cannot ,say the complainants are barred by lapse of time.”

Decree affirmed, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapin v. Churchill
12 How. Pr. 367 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-swift-ind-1849.