Shaw v. State

438 S.W.3d 582, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 951, 2014 WL 4160116
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
DocketNo. PD-249-14
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 S.W.3d 582 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. State, 438 S.W.3d 582, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 951, 2014 WL 4160116 (Tex. 2014).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. On appeal, he argued that the evidence was insufficient to support the $834 in court costs assessed against him in the judgment. The Court of Appeals agreed, relying on its opinion in Johnson v. State, 389 S.W.3d 513 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2012). Shaw v. [583]*583State, 420 S.W.3d 857 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2014).

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review of this decision. We recently handed down our opinion in Johnson v. State, 423 S.W.3d 385 (Tex.Crim.App.2014), in which we set forth a road-map for resolving questions regarding court costs. See also Cardenas v. State, 423 S.W.3d 396 (Tex.Crim.App.2014).

The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in Johnson. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of our opinion in Johnson. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joe Amos Shaw v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 S.W.3d 582, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 951, 2014 WL 4160116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-texcrimapp-2014.