Shaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Shaw v. State

138 S.W. 112, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 589

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Tex. Crim. 337 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 31, 1911·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of murder in the first degree, and bis punishment assessed at confinement in tbe penitentiary for life.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record, and the only ground stated in the motion for a new trial is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. Under these circumstances, there is nothing to review. The in-dictinent charges an offense, and the charge submits this offense to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of murder in the first degree, and bis punishment assessed at confinement in tbe penitentiary for life.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record, and the only ground stated in the motion for a new trial is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. Under these circumstances, there is nothing to review. The in-dictinent charges an offense, and the charge submits this offense to the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Shaw v. State, 138 S.W. 112, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 589 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

138 S.W. 112 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.