Shaw v. State

33 S.W. 978, 35 Tex. Crim. 394, 1896 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 1896
DocketNo. 890.
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 33 S.W. 978 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. State, 33 S.W. 978, 35 Tex. Crim. 394, 1896 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21 (Tex. 1896).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of betting at dice at a place other than a qirivate residence. The facts show that he threw the dice, took all bets, stood behind the table, and was “one against the many.” In other words, he was the dealer; hence the game was a banking game. Bell v. State, 32 Tex. Crim. Rep., 187. He could not, therefore, be convicted for betting at his own banking game. Askey v. State, 20 Tex. Crim. App., 443. The judgment is. reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quinones v. State
592 S.W.2d 933 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Bishop v. State
269 S.W.2d 372 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1940
Bascom v. State
24 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Lay and Jones v. State
198 S.W. 291 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Sorrell v. State
186 S.W. 336 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
McGee v. State
182 S.W. 309 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Bird v. State
148 S.W. 738 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Guill v. State
146 S.W. 198 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Guile v. State
146 S.W. 198 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Roberts v. State
136 S.W. 483 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
State v. Peacock
107 P. 1022 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Vinson v. State
124 S.W. 652 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Faucett v. State
79 S.W. 548 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Wise County v. Montague County
52 S.W. 615 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 S.W. 978, 35 Tex. Crim. 394, 1896 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-texcrimapp-1896.