Shaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Shaw v. State

1929 OK CR 176, 277 P. 278, 43 Okla. Crim. 55, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 202

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 11, 1929

DocketNo. A-6742.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 176 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 1929 OK CR 176, 277 P. 278, 43 Okla. Crim. 55, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 202 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinions

*56 CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor. The jury fixed the punishment of the defendant, Lula Shaw, at 30 days in jail and a fine of $250, and fixed the punishment of the defendant, Ward Shaw, at imprisonment in the county jail for 90 days and a fine of $250.

The case was tried in April, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the case is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*56 CHAPPELL, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of transporting intoxicating liquor. The jury fixed the punishment of the defendant, Lula Shaw, at 30 days in jail and a fine of $250, and fixed the punishment of the defendant, Ward Shaw, at imprisonment in the county jail for 90 days and a fine of $250.

The case was tried in April, 1927, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1927. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed, nor was there any appearance for oral argument at the time the case was submitted.

An examination of the record discloses no jurisdictional or fundamental error. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and the case is therefore affirmed.

EDWARDS, P. J., and DAVENPORT, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 176, 277 P. 278, 43 Okla. Crim. 55, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.