Shaw v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shaw v. State

309 S.W.3d 875, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 627, 2010 WL 1860748

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 11, 2010

DocketED 93329

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 S.W.3d 875 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 309 S.W.3d 875, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 627, 2010 WL 1860748 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Remirus Shaw (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court erred in denying a hearing on his claims that his plea counsel was ineffective for: (1) inducing Movant’s guilty plea by promising drug treatment pursuant to Mo.Rev.Stat. § 217.362; and (2) failing to file and litigate a motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI