Shaw v. State
791 S.W.2d 470, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 890, 1990 WL 79096
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 71 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Michael Shaw, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an eviden-tiary hearing.- We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been supplied stating the reasons for our so holding. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. State, 791 S.W.2d 470, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 890, 1990 WL 79096 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).
791 S.W.2d 470 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.