Shaw v. State

134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 664, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1068
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 4, 1926
Docket17481
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 328 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. State, 134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 664, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1068 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

An accusation alleging that the accused did “unlawfully receive, have, control, and possess in said county intoxicating liquors and prohibited liquors” sufficiently states the offense, without further alleging that such liquors were not wine for sacramental purposes, or [665]*665alcohol for mechanical or medicinal purposes. Martin v. State, 33 Ga. App. 590 (1, 2) (126 S. E. 908), and cit. Under this ruling the court properly overruled the motion in arrest of judgment.

Decided August 4, 1926. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, E. 8. Ault, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bl'oodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
126 S.E. 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 664, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-gactapp-1926.