Shaw v. State
This text of 134 S.E. 328 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An accusation alleging that the accused did “unlawfully receive, have, control, and possess in said county intoxicating liquors and prohibited liquors” sufficiently states the offense, without further alleging that such liquors were not wine for sacramental purposes, or [665]*665alcohol for mechanical or medicinal purposes. Martin v. State, 33 Ga. App. 590 (1, 2) (126 S. E. 908), and cit. Under this ruling the court properly overruled the motion in arrest of judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 328, 35 Ga. App. 664, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-gactapp-1926.