Shaw v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shaw v. State

120 S.E. 648, 31 Ga. App. 309, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 917

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 5, 1923

Docket15048

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 S.E. 648 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 120 S.E. 648, 31 Ga. App. 309, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 917 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, ó. J.

1. The exceptions pendente lite (complaining of the overruling of a demurrer to the indictment) cannot-be considered, as the main bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error upon the exceptions pendente lite or upon the judgment of the court overruling the demurrer. Nor can the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment be a ground of a motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial which were approved by the court (the disapproved grounds not being considered) requires a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI