Shaw v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shaw v. State

77 S.E. 913, 12 Ga. App. 608, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 661

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1913

Docket4617

StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.E. 913 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 77 S.E. 913, 12 Ga. App. 608, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 661 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

In the absence of a written request for a more specific instruction, the chai’ge as given sufficiently instructed the jury in reference to the law of stabbing, and of self-defense. 'The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict of assault with intent to murder. No substantial error of law was committed. Eor this reason, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

In the absence of a written request for a more specific instruction, the chai’ge as given sufficiently instructed the jury in reference to the law of stabbing, and of self-defense. 'The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict of assault with intent to murder. No substantial error of law was committed. Eor this reason, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 913, 12 Ga. App. 608, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-gactapp-1913.