Shaw v. State

74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 776, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 680
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 19, 1912
Docket3781
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 89 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. State, 74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 776, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. In an indictment for burglary, embracing larceny from the house, the description of the stolen property as being “thirty-five pounds of middling meat, of the value of seven & 50/100 dollars, the property of said Len Porter,” was sufficient, and there was no error in overruling the demurrer, based on the ground that the description was not sufficiently definite.

2. The evidence introduced by the defendant did not render the defendant’s presence at the scene of the larceny impossible; and, in the absence of a request to that effect, the judge did not err in omitting to instruct the jury upon the' law of alibi.

Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. State
137 S.E. 860 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Gibson v. State
93 S.E. 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Moore v. State
86 S.E. 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 776, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-gactapp-1912.