Shaw v. State
This text of 74 S.E. 89 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In an indictment for burglary, embracing larceny from the house, the description of the stolen property as being “thirty-five pounds of middling meat, of the value of seven & 50/100 dollars, the property of said Len Porter,” was sufficient, and there was no error in overruling the demurrer, based on the ground that the description was not sufficiently definite.
2. The evidence introduced by the defendant did not render the defendant’s presence at the scene of the larceny impossible; and, in the absence of a request to that effect, the judge did not err in omitting to instruct the jury upon the' law of alibi.
Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 776, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-gactapp-1912.