Shaw v. State
This text of 40 Ga. 120 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was indicted as the actor or absolute perpetrator of the offence charged in the indictment, and the jury found him guilty of the offence charged in the second degree. [122]*122This was error, as was ruled by this Court in Washington vs. The State, 36th Georgia Reports, 222.
It was also error in the Court below in not allowing the witness, Sheridan, to relate all the facts to the jury as to how Paldo came by the money which was paid to the livery-stable man for the hire of the wagon and mules.
Let the'judgment of the Court below be reversed, and a new trial be had.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Ga. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-ga-1869.