Shaw v. State

40 Ga. 120
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Warner, J.

The defendant was indicted as the actor or absolute perpetrator of the offence charged in the indictment, and the jury found him guilty of the offence charged in the second degree. [122] This was error, as was ruled by this Court in Washington vs. The State, 36th Georgia Reports, 222.

It was also error in the Court below in not allowing the witness, Sheridan, to relate all the facts to the jury as to how Paldo came by the money which was paid to the livery-stable man for the hire of the wagon and mules.

Let the'judgment of the Court below be reversed, and a new trial be had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. State, 40 Ga. 120 (Ga. 1869).

40 Ga. 120 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. State
200 Ga. 246 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Nelson v. State
1 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Bullard v. State
128 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Collins v. State
14 S.E. 474 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)