Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State

93 So. 3d 1120, 2012 WL 3023166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12117
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 2012
DocketNo. 4D12-2379
StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 3d 1120 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. State, 93 So. 3d 1120, 2012 WL 3023166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12117 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. The motion was untimely. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. Further, appellant’s claim is without merit. Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maestas v. State
76 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 3d 1120, 2012 WL 3023166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.