Shaw v. State
623 So. 2d 838, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9066, 1993 WL 340676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 611 So. 2d 552 →
Opinion
While we affirm all convictions and sentences, the convictions for both Count II, robbery while carrying a firearm and Count III, grand theft in the third degree of a motor vehicle are affirmed pursuant to the decision in Sirmons v. State, 603 So.2d 82 (Fla. 5th DCA), juris, accepted, 613 So.2d 9 (Fla.1992).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. State, 623 So. 2d 838, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9066, 1993 WL 340676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
623 So. 2d 838 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sirmons v. State
603 So. 2d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)