Shaw v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Shaw v. State

95 So. 210, 19 Ala. App. 83, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 51

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 1922

Docket1 Div. 465.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 95 So. 210 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 95 So. 210, 19 Ala. App. 83, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 51 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

On Rehearing.

[1, 2] The provision of Code 1907, § 6730, does not apply to prohibition cases. Ray v. State, 17 Ala. App, 333, 84 South. 878; Corkran v. State, 17 Ala. App. 112, 82 South. 560; Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 3, 81 South. 179.

The appeal was taken and proceedings certified in accordance with section 6726, Code 1907, and they were sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction of the person. Ex parte Rodgers, 12 Ala. App. 218, 67 South. 710.

The application is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing.

[1, 2] The provision of Code 1907, § 6730, does not apply to prohibition cases. Ray v. State, 17 Ala. App, 333, 84 South. 878; Corkran v. State, 17 Ala. App. 112, 82 South. 560; Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 3, 81 South. 179.

The appeal was taken and proceedings certified in accordance with section 6726, Code 1907, and they were sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction of the person. Ex parte Rodgers, 12 Ala. App. 218, 67 South. 710.

The application is overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 210, 19 Ala. App. 83, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-state-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack