Shaw v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Shaw v. State

95 So. 210, 19 Ala. App. 83, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 51

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 1922·No. 1 Div. 465.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing.

[1, 2] The provision of Code 1907, § 6730, does not apply to prohibition cases. Ray v. State, 17 Ala. App, 333, 84 South. 878; Corkran v. State, 17 Ala. App. 112, 82 South. 560; Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 3, 81 South. 179.

The appeal was taken and proceedings certified in accordance with section 6726, Code 1907, and they were sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction of the person. Ex parte Rodgers, 12 Ala. App. 218, 67 South. 710.

The application is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing.

[1, 2] The provision of Code 1907, § 6730, does not apply to prohibition cases. Ray v. State, 17 Ala. App, 333, 84 South. 878; Corkran v. State, 17 Ala. App. 112, 82 South. 560; Walker v. State, 17 Ala. App. 3, 81 South. 179.

The appeal was taken and proceedings certified in accordance with section 6726, Code 1907, and they were sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction of the person. Ex parte Rodgers, 12 Ala. App. 218, 67 South. 710.

The application is overruled.

Shaw v. State, 95 So. 210, 19 Ala. App. 83, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 51 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

95 So. 210 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related