Shaw v. Shaw

125 S.E. 566, 130 S.C. 338, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 87
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket11624
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 566 (Shaw v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Shaw, 125 S.E. 566, 130 S.C. 338, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 87 (S.C. 1924).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

This is the second appeal in this case. The judgment of this Court on the former appeal, affirming a Circuit Decree of Judge Moore, is reported in 122 S. C., 386; 115 S. E., 322.

The present appeal is from a decree of his Honor, Judge Featherstone. The questions now sought to be raised here were, in substance, raised by exceptions to the Special Ref *339 eree’s Report upon the hearing before Judge Featherstone and were disposed of by him as follows:

“The questions raised are practically the same as those raised by the plaintiff on appeal to the Supreme Court, and have been passed on by that Court adversely to the plaintiff in its affirming the decree of Judge Moore, as being just and right.”

In that view, after careful consideration of appellant’s argument to the contrary, we are satisfied the Circuit Judge was correct.

It is accordingly adjudged that, for the reasons therein stated, the decree of the Circuit Court is hereby affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Fraser and Cothran concur. Mr. Justice Watts dissents. Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw v. Shaw
115 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 566, 130 S.C. 338, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-shaw-sc-1924.