Shaw v. Shaw

Missouri Court of Appeals

Shaw v. Shaw

900 S.W.2d 17, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1153, 1995 WL 365055

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. Shaw. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1646 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 1995·No. No. 67139·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David A Shaw, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County modifying a decree of dissolution by reducing, but not terminating, respondent’s, Roberta A Shaw’s, maintenance award. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file, and find the circuit court’s order is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. Furthermore, we find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and affirm the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David A Shaw, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County modifying a decree of dissolution by reducing, but not terminating, respondent’s, Roberta A Shaw’s, maintenance award. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file, and find the circuit court’s order is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. Furthermore, we find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and affirm the circuit court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Shaw v. Shaw, 900 S.W.2d 17, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1153, 1995 WL 365055 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

900 S.W.2d 17 (Shaw v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.