Shaw v. Shaw
This text of 713 S.W.2d 633 (Shaw v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a civil contempt action. Father sought to hold mother in contempt of a [634]*634prior order with respect to visitation and temporary custody of their minor children. The trial court held mother in contempt.
We understand why mother filed the appeal since the civil contempt order was in the nature of a criminal contempt order. However, a civil contempt order is not a final judgment for purposes of appeal until the order is enforced. Niehoff v. Forney, 692 S.W.2d 635, 636 (Mo.App.1985).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 S.W.2d 633, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 4476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-shaw-moctapp-1986.