Shaw v. Shaw

Michigan Court of Appeals

Shaw v. Shaw

198 N.W.2d 902, 40 Mich. App. 475, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1159

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 4, 1972

DocketDocket No. 11969

StatusPublished

This text of 198 N.W.2d 902 (Shaw v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. Shaw, 198 N.W.2d 902, 40 Mich. App. 475, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1159 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant stipulated he would not contest his wife’s divorce action if, (1) she would submit to marriage counseling with him, and (2) if the counselor ultimately concluded that the problems of the marriage were insurmountable. The trial court en[476]*476tered an order to that effect. The' marriage counselor reported that the problems of the marriage were insurmountable and the parties should be divorced. Defendant appeals the trial court’s enforcement of the stipulation order, on the ground that plaintiff did not cooperate in the counseling sessions.

The trial court found cooperation by both parties. An examination of the records and briefs discloses no error or abuse in the trial court’s ruling authorizing plaintiff to proceed with an uncontested judgment of divorce.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant stipulated he would not contest his wife’s divorce action if, (1) she would submit to marriage counseling with him, and (2) if the counselor ultimately concluded that the problems of the marriage were insurmountable. The trial court en[476]*476tered an order to that effect. The' marriage counselor reported that the problems of the marriage were insurmountable and the parties should be divorced. Defendant appeals the trial court’s enforcement of the stipulation order, on the ground that plaintiff did not cooperate in the counseling sessions.

The trial court found cooperation by both parties. An examination of the records and briefs discloses no error or abuse in the trial court’s ruling authorizing plaintiff to proceed with an uncontested judgment of divorce.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 N.W.2d 902, 40 Mich. App. 475, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-shaw-michctapp-1972.