Shaw v. Russell
This text of 459 N.E.2d 149 (Shaw v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. A party to a foreclosure propeeding who appears and waives service of the papers but who reserves the right to receive notice of sale is entitled to service of such notice in the ordinary manner in which papers are to be served upon a party in a pending action (see CPLR 2103). Notice by publication pursuant to RPAPL 231 is insufficient to comply with that requirement.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 N.E.2d 149, 60 N.Y.2d 922, 471 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-russell-ny-1983.