Shaw v. Roovers Bros. Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Shaw v. Roovers Bros. Inc.

45 N.E.2d 905, 289 N.Y. 348, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 958

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 3, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 45 N.E.2d 905 (Shaw v. Roovers Bros. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. Roovers Bros. Inc., 45 N.E.2d 905, 289 N.Y. 348, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 958 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff produced evidence sufficient to sustain the special verdict, and the trial judge erred in dismissing the complaint. We may not review the order setting aside the *350 verdict on the ground that it is “ against the weight of the evidence ” as well as on the ground that it is “ contrary to law.”

The judgments should be reversed-and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Ch.- J., Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI