Shaw v. Robinson

106 A. 631, 263 Pa. 311, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 422
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 4, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 160
StatusPublished

This text of 106 A. 631 (Shaw v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Robinson, 106 A. 631, 263 Pa. 311, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 422 (Pa. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In directing a verdict for the plaintiff the learned trial judge correctly held that his title extended to low-water mark: Klingensmith v. Ground, 5 Watts 458;. 'Wood v. Appal, 63 Pa. 210; and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below refusing the motion for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. Appal
63 Pa. 210 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)
Klingensmith v. Ground
5 Watts 458 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A. 631, 263 Pa. 311, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-robinson-pa-1919.