Shaw v. Qc-Medi New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shaw v. Qc-Medi New York, Inc.

23 A.D.3d 1129, 803 N.Y.S.2d 479

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.3d 1129 (Shaw v. Qc-Medi New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. Qc-Medi New York, Inc., 23 A.D.3d 1129, 803 N.Y.S.2d 479 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V. Centra, J.), entered May 26, 2004. The order and judgment granted the motions of defendants QC-Medi New York, Inc., Olsten Kimberly Qualitycare, Inc., Olsten Health Services (Quantum) Corp., Olsten Corporation, Stafcare of New York, Inc. (doing business as AmeriCare), and Jean Sanders, L.EN., for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims for punitive damages.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John V. Centra, J.), entered May 26, 2004. The order and judgment granted the motions of defendants QC-Medi New York, Inc., Olsten Kimberly Qualitycare, Inc., Olsten Health Services (Quantum) Corp., Olsten Corporation, Stafcare of New York, Inc. (doing business as AmeriCare), and Jean Sanders, L.EN., for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims for punitive damages.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.3d 1129, 803 N.Y.S.2d 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-qc-medi-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-2005.