Shaw v. Props2Fantasy.com

2025 NY Slip Op 31798(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMay 15, 2025
DocketIndex No. 652810/2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31798(U) (Shaw v. Props2Fantasy.com) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaw v. Props2Fantasy.com, 2025 NY Slip Op 31798(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

Shaw v Props2Fantasy.com 2025 NY Slip Op 31798(U) May 15, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 652810/2024 Judge: Judy H. Kim Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 652810/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. JUDY H. KIM PART 04 Justice ------------------------------X INDEX NO. 652810/2024 DOMINIC SHAW, MOTION DATE 02/17/2025 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 - V -

PROPS2FANTASY.COM, ADAM WEINSTEIN, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendants. ---------------------------------·-------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, plaintiffs motion for a default judgment is granted in part,

as to his conversion claim against defendant Props2Fantasy.com, and otherwise denied.

Plaintiff alleges that on or about October 6, 2022, he registered an account on the fantasy

sports website thrivefantasy.com (the "Website"), which is owned and operated by defendants

Props2fantasy.com (NYSCEF Doc No. 2, complaint at i\i\4, 6). In doing so, he accepted the

Website's terms of use which provided, inter alia, that he could withdraw his funds from the site

"at any time and for any reason" (id. at i\20). Plaintiff then "entered several contests on the Website,

yielding an account balance of $40,028.72" (id. at i(7). Despite attempts to withdraw his account

balance on September 16, 2023, and November 15, 2023, plaintiff has been unable to do so (id. at

i(8). Plaintiffs complaint asserts claims for: (1) breach of contract; (2) unjust enrichment; (3)

breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and (4) conversion. He also seeks

treble damages and attorney's fees pursuant to General Business Law §349. As defendants have

652810/2024 SHAW, DOMINIC vs. PROPS2FANTASY.COM ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. 652810/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2025

failed to answer or appear, plaintiff now moves for default judgment.

DISCUSSION

In order to establish a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215, plaintiff must submit proof

of: (1) service of the summons and complaint; (2) the facts constituting the claim; and (3)

defendants' default in answering or appearing (see Gordon Law Firm, P. C. v Premier DNA Corp.,

205 AD3d 416,416 [1st Dept 2022]). "CPLR 3215 does not contemplate that default judgments

are to be rubberstamped once jurisdiction and a failure to appear has been shown. Some proof of

liability is also required to satisfy the court as to the prima facie validity of the uncontested cause

of action" (Peffer v Ma/peso, 210 AD2d 60 [1st Dept 1994]). The standard of proof is not stringent,

amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (id.).

As an initial matter, the branch of plaintiffs motion seeking a default judgment as against

Adam Weinstein is denied. The complaint alleges that Weinstein is the founder and Chief

Executive Officer of Props2fantasy.com but lacks specific allegations of dominion, control, and

wrongdoing to meet the "heavy burden" to support piercing the corporate veil to hold Weinstein

personally liable (see 2497 Realty Corp. v Fuertes, 232 AD3d 451, 452 [1st Dept 2024] [internal

citations omitted]); see also Remora Capital SA. v Dukan, 175 AD3d 1219, 1220 [1st Dept 2019]).

Plaintiff has, however, established his entitlement to a default judgment against

Props2Fantasy.com on his conversion claim. "The tort of conversion is established when one who

owns and has a right to possession of personal property proves that the property is in the

unauthorized possession of another who has acted to exclude the rights of the owner" (Lew inter v

Charity Beverage USA Corp., 2008 NY Slip Op 31554[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2008] [internal

citations omitted]) and plaintiff has established that he has the right to possess the funds at issue

652810/2024 SHAW, DOMINIC vs. PROPS2FANTASY.COM ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 652810/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2025

and that his requests to withdraw these funds has been ignored and Props2Fantasy.com remains in

possession of same without authorization (see e.g. Shabtai v HFZ Capital Group, LLC, 75 Misc

3d 1226(A) [Sup Ct, NY County 2022] ["An action for conversion requires a specific, identifiable

fund and an obligation to treat it in a particular manner or otherwise return it"], order affd, appeal

dismissed, 220 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2023]). Plaintiff has also established that props2fantasy.com

was served with process via the New York State Secretary of State per BCL §306(b), with a follow-

up mailing as required by CPLR 3215(g)(4) (NYSCEF Doc No. 3, 15), and that

Props2Fantasy.com has failed to appear.

Finally, the Court notes that treble damages and attorney's fees under GBL §349 are not

warranted here. That statute applies when a defendant "engaged in (1) consumer-oriented conduct

that is (2) materially misleading and that (3) plaintiff suffered injury as a result of the allegedly

deceptive act or practice" (Koch v Acker, Merrall & Condit Co., 18 NY3d 940, 941 [2012] [internal

citations and quotations omitted]). An act or practice is consumer-oriented when it has "a broader

impact on consumers at large" (Trump Vil. Section 4, Inc. v Lawless & Mangione Architects

Engineers LLP, 2022 NY Slip Op. 33159[U], 15-18 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2022] [internal

citations and quotations omitted], affd sub nom. Trump Vil. Section 4, Inc. v Lawless & Mangione

Architects & Engineers, LLP, 2025 NY Slip Op 01003 [2d Dept 2025]). The facts set out here do

not satisfy this standard. By plaintiffs own admission, he was informed of the Website's terms

and conditions at issue only after going to defendants' Website and commencing the sign-up

process. Accordingly, the terms and conditions' representation that customers could withdraw

funds at any time was not directed at the consuming public or "made for the purpose of inducing

the public at large into consuming a product or service or that the representations affected

652810/2024 SHAW, DOMINIC vs. PROPS2FANTASY.COM ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 001

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. 652810/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2025

consumer decision-making" (Simmons v Assistcare Home Health Services LLC, 2021 NY Slip Op

32966[U], 9-11 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2021]). The fact that two other individuals have

commenced separate actions against defendants based on similar facts does not bring this action

within the remit of GBL §349.

The Court does not reach the remaining causes of action of the complaint.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the branch of plaintiffs motion for default judgment is granted in part, to

the extent that plaintiff Dominic Shaw is granted leave to enter default judgment as against

defendant Props2Fantasy.com on his fifth cause of action, for conversion, and is denied as against

defendant Adam Weinstein; and it is further,

ORDERED that plaintiff Dominic Shaw is awarded a money judgment in his favor as

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koch v. ACKER, MERRALL & CONDIT COMPANY
967 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
Feffer v. Malpeso
210 A.D.2d 60 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Trump Vil. Section 4, Inc. v. Lawless & Mangione Architects & Engrs., LLP
2025 NY Slip Op 01003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 31798(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaw-v-props2fantasycom-nysupctnewyork-2025.