Shaw v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

101 A.D. 246, 91 N.Y.S. 746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.:

This action is brought to recover damages for causing the death of -the plaintiff’s intestate; IT pan the trial the plaintiff’s letters of admin[247]*247istration were introduced in evidence and thereafter upon motion stricken out. The complaint has apparently been dismissed for the reason that the plaintiff has not shown himself entitled to bring the action.

After the introduction by plaintiff of his letters of administration, the .defendant introduced the petition upon which those letters were granted. That petition purported to have been verified before a notary public in the county of New York, while the venue of the affidavit of verification was stated as State of New York, County of Columbia.” The veniie of the affidavit is prima facie the place where it is taken. (Babcock v. Kuntzsch, 85 Hun, 33.) By section 2591 of the Code of Civil Procedure it is provided that letters of administration granted by a court “ having jurisdiction to grant them as prescribed in this chapter,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 101 A.D. 246, 91 N.Y.S. 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

101 A.D. 246 (Shaw v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Cooper
62 Misc. 517 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)