Shaw v. Johnson
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40959 Conference Calendar __________________
DONNY RAY SHAW,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
Respondent-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:90-CV-312 - - - - - - - - - - June 25, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donny Ray Shaw, (#397642), appeals the denial of his motion
construed by the district court as a motion for relief from
judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in this habeas
proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Shaw did not appeal the
judgment denying habeas relief, but waited over three years to
file objections to the magistrate judge’s report. Because Shaw
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40959 -2-
does not address on appeal the issue regarding the district
court's action in denying the Rule 60(b) motion, he has abandoned
the only issue on appeal before this court, and this court need
not address the issue. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff
Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, Shaw's
appeal is DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
We caution Shaw that any additional frivolous appeals filed
by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, Shaw is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shaw v. Johnson (Shaw v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.